Archive for the ‘Steenbergs’ Category

Where’s The Economy Really At?

Friday, August 13th, 2010

I have been intrigued by comments by Mervyn King and others about the state of the economy, as I am not sure whether they ever take into account the real situation for small companies.  So I thought I would briefly blog some notes about Steenbergs at present.

Employment – Unemployment : one of our members of staff has just left to another business on site and we are advertising to fill that post at the Jobcentre Online (our favourite way of advertising), which is just the best service.  In the past, when we have sought to recruit for this same role, we would get maybe 3 or 4 applicants, but this time we have 20+ applicants and they are still coming in. 

Firstly, it’s a warehouse role, so where are the ladies who would like to do this, as while it is being offered as part-time and for anyone, we are only getting men applying and of all ages, but not a single woman.  Secondly, there appear to be a lot of local people who have been made redundant recently.  Thirdly, I am not sure whether there are really more people available, or whether because of the gloominess in the air, people have set are prepared to look at a part-time role where in the past they would only have looked for full-time.

Finally, we are changing a full-time role into a part-time role, or perhaps no role if we do not find the right person. Are we simply part of a general caution in the economy that has become fearful about recruiting, because of the fixed costs of financing such a role and the structural rigidity of hiring someone (and the emotional desire to keep that person employed once taken on) rather than bringing in temporary staff as and when we need them.

Credit quality: We have noticed a real fall off in the credit quality of businesses we deal with over the last 6 – 9 months.  Now my dad always says that “only businesses with no business have no bad debts”, but still people who do not pay their debts frustrate and waste a lot of time and energy.  I know that some of you will say use credit checking agencies and that will mitigate your risk, but most of the people we deal with have no credit history as they are small, start-ups or have no real debt history, hence we need to make our own judgment calls.  So while we have not had such a big bad debt as we had 3 years ago (I am crossing my fingers and touching as much wood as I can find as I write that spookily self-prophesying line), we certainly have had more in volume.  Most have been small debts of less than £100 each, but they add up and are truly infuriating. 

Many people this year just seem to be disappearing or telling us that they are closing down without paying out their debts, or the administrators get called in to protect the creditors – has anyone ever been paid out by the administrators as it is mysterious how the banks and the administrators themselves seem to take any available cash and leave the small creditors out to hang and dry?  It’s that eternal thing of the big being protected and the weak being screwed. 

Our worst recent experience was The Natural Kitchen that went down last year after they had ordered lots of kit from us just before going into administration – the annoyance was they only bought from us because as Northerners we did not know they were in dire straits (I am sure everyone in London knew!) and when we asked for the stuff back they said they would pay for half of the invoice as they knew they did not really own it, but they never did – rightly assessing that we would never drive from Yorkshire to London to take back the remaining stuff from the shelves; serves me right, I guess.  And Natural Kitchen are backed by millionaires from the property world and investment banking, who quaff their premier cru wines without a care for the hard earned cash of others - disgraceful, but completely legal – aaaargh, it still makes me grumpy!

Sales: actually, they are doing surprisingly well, but we continue to innovate, tweaking our designs, range and recipes.  A few buyers of bulk ingredients are trying to switch to non-organic from organic, but some of the less active ones from last year like Spicemanns/Kerry Ingredients and Elgar Foods and Walkers Shortbread are buying again, while new ones are coming on stream, such as Northumbrian Fine Foods and John Morley; we seem to do well with small batches of blended spices for organic Fairtrade mixed spice and organic sausage seasonings (e.g. for Northumbrian Quality Meats and Riverford Organic) that no-one else will or can do, including exports of our organic curry powders to the Continent.  Prices are stabilising with less currency turmoil, even though commodity pressure is still upwards, which gives better pricing forecasts overall; everyone was nervous in 2009 as costs were all over the place, and contracts from previous years had became onerous. 

General retail is only slightly up, but that’s partly our fault as we have chosen not to embrace with the big bears of the retailing world as we are not ready to lose control of who we are and what we stand for, even if it means sales will not go into the stratosphere; we are seeing good sales of Steenbergs organic bakery ingredients via distributors like Hider, Queenswood, Suma and Tree of Life and continued good sales into some of our bigger stores like Fenwicks, Selfridges and Wholefoods on High Street Kensington, as well as really exciting enquiries from overseas, such as Whole Foods Market in the US. 

Then the web store is going a storm, but that’s more to do with increased tinkering by Sophie and me on search engine optimisation and playing with social marketing (the challenges of Facebook, Flickr, Linkedin, Twitter and we are even looking at how to use Youtube), allied to a massive increase in the range of products that we sell.  We genuinely think we do www.steenbergs.co.uk differently from anyone else’s way of retailing (whether www.tesco.com or www.ethicalsuperstore.com), and will continue to do it in our own eccentric way, for better or worse, chosing products that fit with Steenbergs image as ethical, green and different. 

It’s tough trying to change the world, but every small step forward is a step in the right direction – we will not give in to the temptations of a quick, easy buck, however nice that would be.

Given that ramble, where are we then? Cautiously optimistic about Steenbergs, but gloomy about the state of the economy.

Wheelbirks Ice Cream

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010
Wheelbirks Farm Near Stocksfield

Wheelbirks Farm Near Stocksfield

On the way back from Scotland, we went through Northumberland and on a “memory lane detour” went via Wheelbirks Farm which is near Stocksfield.  Memory lane because I was brought up on Wheelbirks Jersey Milk when the farm used to have a milk round, and so were my father and grandparents.

Orchard At Wheelbirks Farm In Northumberland

Orchard At Wheelbirks Farm In Northumberland

The Richardsons have since started making their own ice cream using their deliciously creamy Jersey milk for the base.  You drive past a little village called Hindley and then up their farm drive and through the farmyard to the Ice Cream Parlour at the back.  Other than the food, there is an decent play area in the orchard at the back, and for smaller children inside, and a small barn that you can look in to see some calves and a bull, plus as a working farm so you might see loads of other comings and goings.  I love the web site where you can see pictures of past prize winning cows and current pictures of other ones, which shows their love of their Jersey herd.

Ice Cream Parlour At Wheelbirks Farm

Ice Cream Parlour At Wheelbirks Farm

The actual Ice Cream Parlour has been very tastefully decked out and split into two – half bright, light and functional looking like a 60s American joint while the other half is all dark wood for a warmer, more natural English country kitchen feel.  They make their own ice cream using a tiny little machine that pasteurises the milk, then make the ice cream before they all get busy packing off the ice cream by hand into tubs for sale in the shop or sending off to Alnwick Castle.

There is a delicious range of flavours including New York Cheesecake, Licquorice & Caramel, Blueberry Muffin, Strawberry, Cookies & Cream, Triple Chocolate, Mint Choc Chip, Peach & Raspberry and Amaretto & Honeycomb.  Prices are £1.15, £2.65 and £3.65 for single, double or triple scoop ice creams.  Alternatively, you can go for tubs, or slices of cake for £1.90 each; I had a huge slice of Coffee & Walnut cake then scavenged tastes of the ice creams from the kids.

My Father Enjoying His Ice Cream

My Father Enjoying His Ice Cream

The ice cream is deliciously rich and creamy in flavour, while the flavours are interesting and full of amazing taste.  Really a luxurious place for a treat.  Our favourites are New York Cheesecake which I could eat all day, Cookies & Cream and Blueberry Muffin, which were all seductively gorgeous.

If you can, you should also buy a bottle of their unpasteurised, unhomogenised full fat milk, which is tasty milk the way it should be, with a thick slick of heavy cream floating on the top of the milk for 80p.  You can also buy Wheelbirks unpasteurised cream at 70p for 142ml, or try the Longley Farm Luxury Jersey Butter at £1.25 per pat of butter and uses their milk, which the Richardsons send down to Longley Farm’s factory in Holmfirth.  It’s good to know that one of my favourites – the rich, natural tasting creamy butter from Longley farm – comes from a source that I like and respect.

Wheelbirks Ice Cream easily gets to the top of our list of favourite ice cream shops we have visited, so try and make a trip to enjoy it.

I Don’t Know

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

I had recently found that our children, as well as some colleagues at work, would always answer questions “I don’t know” or “Don’t know”, whether it’s the answer to “What do you want for supper tonight?” or “What did you do at school today?”  So I have bought the web domain www.idontknow.co.uk, but the irony is that I don’t know what to use it for.  At the moment, it is being redirected to www.steenbergs.co.uk, but better thoughts and ideas would be gratefully received, e.g. for a childrens’ clothing range or a website that asks those questions you don’t know the answer to.  Yes, I know those have already been done and that’s why we’re not doing them, but there must be something to build in that space…

Razor Review From Steenbergs

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

For many years, I shaved with a Gillette safety razor that used a classic plastic double-bladed Contour disposable blade until mid 2009.  However, I did not find the shave particularly close or satisfying, and I didn’t like having to chuck the blades in the normal trash can.  So I have been on the hunt for a better shave that also might have less of an impact on the environment.

My first blind alley was on the environmentally friendly.  I looked at a disposable razor from Preserve, but they were disposable, cheap looking and they didn’t offer a special blade, so you were advised just to use the normal Gillette razor blades.  What a waste of time.

So I decided to go back to the start.  I have had my Gillette basic razor for over 25 years and it has served me well, while my dad has been using the same classic Gillette Safety razor for 60 years.  The razor itself, therefore, lasts and has no impact on the planet unless you buy disposables but they are a terrible shave, so I reckoned that perhaps I should spend some money on getting a really good razor that has been engineered well and looks good, shaves well and glides well over the face.  So the search began.

Let’s start with the Merkur Razors.  These are made in Germany by DOVO Solingen, look good and are generally really well engineered, just as you would expect from a German product.

Merkur Razors 34C and 42

Merkur Razors 34C and 42

I began with Merkur 34C which is a good-looking shiny, closed comb steel razor, with a heavy weight and relatively short handle at 76g and 8½cm resepectively.  The handle has a useful cross-harch design that is good for grip and the end twists to release the top of the razor head to enable you to place the razor blade easily onto it.  The blade is then screwed down simply using the twisting knob.  As a razor, I found the handle of the Merkur 34C just a bit too short, but that’s because I am used to a longer handled razor, but the balance was good and it moved over the face well to give a decent shave.  I found that the razor head seemed to stick on my skin a bit as it moved around which meant that I had to tug a little as I went along; I could imagine that this could cause cuts on a bad day or for those less used to wet shaving.  But overall, I liked the look, weight, balance and shave, although I do prefer a lighter razor with a longer handle.

Following on from this, I tried the Merkur 42.  This was lighter than the others at a mere 65g and with an 8½cm handle.  The design is a hexagon with a fancy design but none of this helps as the grip is less sure than the 34C and uncomfortable.  The blade mechanism is difficult, as you need to twist the whole handle and then the top of the razor head comes off, yet it all was quite stiff and laborious.  As for the shave, it was fine, sticking a little as you move the head over the face rather than gliding; I reckon this must be something to do with the angle of the blade, the distance of the blade from the comb on the razor head and the skin which is off a bit, or at least wrong for my face.  All in all not as good as the Merkur 34C, feeling and looking cheaper as if it was going for style over substance.

Then, there’s the Merkur Futur Razor which is a gorgeous beast of a razor – it’s the Porsche to the Vauxhall Astra that’s the Gillette Contour razor.  The Merkur Futur comes in at a heavy 119g with a 10½cm handle, designed with a futuristic, curvaceous style like the Guggenheim in Bilbao or the Aston Martin One-77, but hugely cheaper.  The mechanism is simple and neat to use, you just flip the lid and off comes the top of the razor head, so you can slot on a razor blade.  Next, there is a neat function where you can adjust the distance between blade and edge between settings from 1 – 6, giving much greater accuracy of the shave and the ability to change the shaving style to suit your own face and way of shaving.  At 6 more of the blade is exposed, down to 1 which has less blade exposed and gives a safer shave.  The Merkur Futur gives a great shave, but like a fast car, it’s not really a razor just to casually have a go with, as you are likely to cut yourself a few times; this is for someone who is experienced with a wet shave and wants a bit of luxury.

I have, also, tried the Mühle R89, which is a German made three piece razor that you twist apart and then place the razor into the parts.  The Mühle R89 weighs 67g and has a 9½cm handle.  The design is good looking with a well engineered German finish, that has a great feel to it as these razors are well balanced.  While the three piece razor top is fiddly, all the pieces fit together perfectly, resulting in the razor blade sitting really snugly on the razor head. For me, the handle was just right, with a good grip from the knurled handle and the weight & balance is good.  As for the shave, it was great, moving over the face very well and giving a good clean finish and not at all aggressive, feeling a bit like the classic Gillette Super Speed razor.  For me, it’s probably the best looking razor of the ones I am reviewing here and has become my favourite shave of all those razors that I have tested recently.  The Mühle R89 would be good as a starter wet shave razor and for those who have sensitive skin.

Muhle R89 Razor

Muhle R89 Razor

Next, it’s the turn of Parker Razors which have been manufactured in India by JTC since 1973.  They have a retro feel about them and are generally pretty well made, and the packaging has recently got better, looking less cheap and plasticky.  The two Parker Razors that I have tried are the 71R and 90R. 

The 71R looks good with a long matt black handle that’s 10½cm in length while the weight is 80g.  The mechanism is a safety razor head that twists off with the whole handle and then the comb and razor top.  Unfortunately, the balance of the razor is not good with it definitely swaying to the head, giving you less control in the movement of the razor head over the face.  The razor head glides over the face pretty well, but the actual shave is not very close and does not leave a great finish.  All-in-all the Parker 71R was not great.

However, the Parker 90R is a different matter all together.  The Parker 90R razor has a similar long handle at 10½cm, but is much lighter at 73g and is much better balanced, although still a bit top heavy.  What I really like about the Parker 90R is the razor blade mechanism, which is a butterfly mechanism that you twist the base of the razor’s handle and the top moves, then opens out, allowing you to simply place the razor blade on top of the razor head easily and safely.  The shaving action is similarly easy, gliding over your face, giving a decent smooth shave.  The distance between blade and razor and face is well proportioned meaning that even new wet shavers should be able to shave without too much hassle.  I had been shaving with the Parker 90R since I stopped using my trusty old Gillette Contour of 25 years, but have just switched to the Mühle R89 for everyday shaving.

Parker Razors 71R and 90R

Parker Razors 71R and 90R

So for now, Steenbergs is selling the Mühle R89 and Parker 90R razors as entry level razors for those just starting with wet shaving, while the Mühle R89 is also great for those who have more sensitive skin.  The Merkur Futur is for men who prefer a more aggressive shave and want to invest into something really heavy and flash.

Sprouting Beans

Friday, June 25th, 2010

We have just put Just Wholefoods Organic Sprouting Bean Mix onto Steenbergs web shop.  I remember my mum used to grow mung bean sprouts in a Kilner jar at home which was quite fun and tasted really fresh and crunchy in salads or used in a stir fry.  So in memory of those angry days in the late 1970s, we have been growing the seeds in large jars in Steenbergs office to see how well they work.

Sprouting Seeds - Day One

Sprouting Seeds - Day One

Day 5 - Smaller Seeds Sprouted

Day 5 - Smaller Seeds Sprouted

Day 5 - Enjoying The Small Seed Sprouts on Spelt Bread

Day 5 - Enjoying The Small Seed Sprouts on Spelt Bread

Big Seeds Starting To Sprout

Big Seeds Starting To Sprout

Photo from Getty Images, supposedly

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

We recently inadvertently used a photo of some tomatoes that we found on Google Images in a subcategory of our web site and which is also available at Salmonella Blog.  Getty Images have sent us an unreasonable letter stating that we have, supposedly, breached the copyright of some photographer called Wilf James for use of his photo in a thumbnail-sized picture and will “generously” only charge us a discounted licence fee of £381.15.  On knowing this , we immediately removed the photo and apologised, however (and even after an unseemly bit of begging by me for a reduction in costs) they have continued to be unreasonable and not waived the costs, which considering we only sold £420 of tomato products in the last 18 months is really mean, but then that’s business.  Getty Images comment is (a) that’s Steenbergs problem not Getty Images; and (b) that it is up to Steenbergs to ensure that there is no copyright in images on the Internet, however the law is outmoded and needs to be changed as this makes it unreasonably onerous on small businesses and individuals who cannot afford the time and money to determine the copyright hidden within an image and as they cannot see a chain of ownership of intellectual property cannot reasonably be expected to check authenticity of copyright.  I think it is time for the UK’s law on copyright to be overhauled to take into account reality of Internet and modern technology – another example of lack of clarity is that every time you download a CD track from a purchased CD onto your computer or MP3 that may also a breach of copyright, but this is plainly unenforceable and probably not in the spirit of the law.

Here’s my partial view on Getty Images:

(i) For any intellectual property rights to be claimed, there should be genuine intellectual value in the item found free on the internet.  However, this was a generic photo of some tomatoes that was used in a minor subcategory as a cm x cm tiny photo that came up as your mouse waived over it.  Not much genuine value or intellectual effort in there, which I recreated in a few minutes (see below).

(ii) I am unconvinced that it is reasonable and equitable to make retrospective charges for an item that was prominently available without charge and without restriction as a top ranked picture on a global medium such as Google, and which a couple of seconds of research can be found on at least 2 other sites unacknowledged and without evidence of copyright.  This is like opening Wembley for a football match, letting everyone watch it, then pursuing people for ticket money after the event for photographing the match and publishing photos on the internet.

(iii) I believe that the onus should be upon the copyright owner to protect its copyright by using technology to prevent copying (which is available) and/or to make known that an item is subject to copyright when it is so.  This provides shoppers for content the opportunity to make a purchasing decision at a point of sale through weighing up economic value at an intangible (but real) checkout.  It should not be up to innocent users to make those checks nor to pay unreasonable licence fees later.  There should be a statute of limitations based on linkages that acknowledges that where a chain of ownership becomes broken it is up to the copyright owner to rebuild that chain and show effort in protecting that chain rather than seeking out overtly usurous consideration for innocent users of free content after the event.  In effect, this is like money laundering – how far down the chain are people guilty?  Obviously, the original money launderer is guilty then perhaps the one after that but by the fifth person down the line, they are completely unaware that any money they are touching is illegal so they cannot be complicit or guilty of being involved in the original crime.

(iv) Finally, I revert to point (i).  The copyright owner needs to demonstrate that there is value in its copyright.  I do not believe there is any significant value in this copyright.  To prove this, I have taken a photo of tomatoes that does the job that the illegally used picture is supposed to have provided valuable intellectual input into, and so worthy of the payment of economic consideration.  It took about 2 minutes to set up and photograph and 5 minutes on Photoshop, plus a few minutes to upload.  We had already got the tomatoes in the fridge, but that plus my time, gives the thumbnail a value of about £2.38 not £381.15 (which intriguingly is also twice the cost of the tomatoes from Morrisons).  And anyone who wants it it’s free and you can use it…

Red Tomatoes

Red Tomatoes

Since we started, we have tried to do all our own photography and, where we haven’t, it is photography that we have been provided by suppliers.  This was the only photo (I am told) that we didn’t take – a bout of human laziness for which we apologise and must obviously pay in blood.  While we theoretically have copyright in our own pictures and wording, we do not charge for this or stop people using it free of charge.  In fact, some of our competitors have even taken our wording straight from the web and then put it into their marketing literature, but we don’t complain – it’s a form of flattery - and life is about sharing the glories of the world rather than keeping them for oneself, selfishly.

Greed is so outmoded.  Bling is so dated.

My rant hides a more important point.  The internet kills the idea of intellectual property.  It has massacred the music industry, decimated the newspaper industry and will soon destroy the TV sector.  It has changed the way we communicate and purchase most products.  The days of making money out of controlling intellect are over.  In the same way that printing destroyed the control of intellect by the scribes and church, mass education took away the power of the political oligarchies formed around the landed classes, so the internet (and digital technology generally) is removing the value and power of politicians, media barons and the intellegentsia.

This is freedom, this is highly destructive and it’s awesome.   

The key to the future is collaboration.  Collaboration between scientists and academics is provided essentially for free through magazines and the internet (in fact the internet was invented to share scientific knowledge).  Collaboration is what drives Twitter and Facebook.  Collaboration is what will save people from themselves.  The mobile phone has connected more people together and done more to sort out third world poverty than all the charities combined.  Working together, connecting with each other and sharing is how we will all build the future together, rather than miserly behaviour to any overinflated perceptions of our own intellectual worth and value.

As a result, I have asked our web developers at Engage Interactive to address one of my bugbears about our site – that the photos are not searchable over the web nor are they captioned with a title, but just come up with a numerical value.  But we already are providing some of these photos over Flickr and I would also love to open up all our pictures on the blog to the wider world.

So the question is: do I just pay the money or do we pay it in tomatoes (that would be fun to send a pallet of tomatoes to the posh offices of Getty Images at 116 Bayham Street in London) or do we seek to challenge this stupid concept of seeking to charge for free content after the event through the Courts?

Update 12/11/2010:

I add this update as this blog post has received a load of comments some 5 months after it was originally posted.  Rather than take it down after the resolution of the original complaint, I posted a comment below that explained what we had done (18/6/2010), so that anyone who read the piece could see changes as they developed over time, however the comments I have been receiving do not realise that payment was paid in full.  We accepted that we were wrong and, although it was an crass error by someone within Steenbergs, we settled the claim, paid the full amount to Getty Images and took down the tomato picture, replacing it with one of our own photos.  And as I say in several other comments, Steenbergs does not have a policy of using photos other than our own, which we take ourselves (several thousand of them – all of an amateurish Steenbergs standard), but out of laziness a picture was used rather than doing as we expect and taking an original photograph; I then had to take a picture at no cost in time or real effort as we did not need a professional photo in the first place.  Notwithstanding all of that, as enthusiastic amateurs, we place no creative value on our own IP within the retail web site and corporate web site, blog, Flickr, Twitter or Facebook accounts and people are free to use the content should they so wish.

Review of Mens Shaving Range at Steenbergs

Monday, June 14th, 2010

I have been looking at our range of shaving and other mens products at Steenbergs over the last few weeks to see whether we can improve it further.  As modern hippies, I like being clean shaven so growing a beard was never on the cards, but I have tried to pick some different products that are not available on the high street.  For example, I like the Somerset’s range and have been recommended it by various punters as being great for sensitive skin, but you can get their products in Boots, Ocado, Sainsburys, Waitrose and on their own web site already, so I didn’t get the point of those as we could never get near their prices.

I  – Axel Steenberg – like the Lavera range of men’s products as these have been devised by Thomas Haas at Laverana, who has been making natural cosmetics since 1987.  As a sufferer of neurodermatitis, he is very aware of making skincare products that are delicate on the skin and moisturising.  Laverana uses natural raw plant materials as the base of its skincare ranges, which are grown organically as much as possible, and their products are completely free from classic nasties like industrial chemicals such as perfumes, colourants and preservatives.  And everything is tested on volunteers, as well as by skin and allergy specialists.

These Lavera Men’s Products are some of the most ethical products you will find on the market, and they work.  I have been shaving with the Shaving Cream for some weeks now and it gives a great close shave that’s comparable to my normal traditional soap and brush shave, and is not as aggressive on your skin.  I tend to finish the shave by using a natural coconut oil moisturiser that replaces the lost oils during the harshness of the traditional single blade razor that I use, but we also have the Lavera After Shave Balm for anyone who would prefer a more refreshing and disinfecting after shave experience.

These new Lavera shaving, after shave balm and deodorants complement very well Steenbergs Weleda range of Shaving Creams that are based on biodynamic herbal products.  Both ranges are excellent and far superior for the skin and the environment compared to high street brands and own label supermarket brands.

I have also been trying the Thermal Mud Range of Male Grooming Kit that are based on thermal mud from boiling mud pools around Rotorua on New Zealand’s North Island.  The thermal mud is sterilized, then refined to remove any traces of volcanic ash.  The Thermal Mud is packed full of natural minerals and has a high affinity for moisture, so is highly restorative for the skin. 

Parrs Shaving Gel gives a nice clean shave – it looks a yucky, grey sludgy colour that comes out clear on the skin and allows the razor to run smoothly over your face.  It’s a bit strange actually seeing your skin whilst shaving, having spent the last 25 years scraping away at white foam or soap from a classic shaving cream or soap.  I found that it was easier to shave with than the soap that I normally use and did not irritate the skin; overall, it gives a slightly less close shave than the Lavera Shaving Cream but the upside is that you will get fewer nicks while shaving.  I then treated my face afterwards with the Thermal Mud Moisturiser which usefully comes with a sun protection in it – something I like all men are bad at putting on.

In addition, Steenbergs has included other Thermal Mud products including After Shave Balm, Soap, Shower Gel and a Facial Scrub.

None of these products need a shaving brush and can be used like a normal shaving cream from the high street, so you can replace your Boots  or Gillette shaving foams with these.  They are much less aggressive on your skin and pretty quickly will make your skin much happier, less dry and more glowing.

The new men’s skincare products complement earlier additions to Steenbergs range of male grooming items, including safety razors from Parker and Merkur, traditional shaving soaps and creams from Cyril Salter and Taylors of Bond Street.

My top shave currently is: Parker 90R safety razor, Wilkinson Sword blades (simply, still the best), fake badger brush with traditional shaving soap, followed by after shave treatment with coconut oil to moisturise the skin.  But I am about to trial a Mühle R89 that seems like another great bit of German engineering!

Two Business Decisions That Will Shape Steenbergs Over Years Ahead

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

We’ve made a couple of small, seemingly innocuous commercial decisions in the last 10 days that will probably have a dramatic impact on Steenbergs as a business over the next 5 – 10 years.

Firstly, we had a visit from Waitrose at their behest to discuss some own label lines of flavoured salts that they would incorporate into exclusive recipe based adverts by Heston Blumenthal and Delia Smith.  We decided to turn down with working with them any further for many reasons, but the key thing really just boiled down to the fact that own label,  non organic work for a high street retailer just didn’t fit with where Steenbergs wants to go, particularly where neither of these chefs have any leanings towards “green issues”, i.e. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall might have made our decision harder.

Secondly, we have just asked to stop our FLO-Cert Trader Status for Fairtrade spices as the commercial basis for it didn’t stack up.  We can still trade Fairtrade spices in the UK and Ireland, but having to market Fairtrade spices across Europe for tiny margins was just not economic for us – we were actually not making any money on that side at all except for some sales of organic Fairtrade vanilla extract, but that work died away for us late last year when Divine switched their supplier.  Also, allied to that, there was no real interest from major chocolate makers for good Fairtrade vanilla as Green & Black’s has managed to get a derogation and so uses a non-Fairtrade vanilla extract in its Fairtrade chocolate bars, while Cadbury’s Dairy Milk contains industrial vanillin rather than a gorgeous vanilla alongside it’s “glass and a half of fresh milk from the British Isles”.

Why have we said no to both?  We believe that the next stage for small, ethical food producers is building out our use of the Internet.  We believe that media, communications and shopping will come closer together and over time those specialists with a web presence that has rich media content will be able to more than hold their own against the big behemoths that are the high street retailers.  The key is rich, unique content and the creation of web personality, rather than just being a database of products loitering on the world wide web. 

Why can small businesses like us succeed? (a) we have a personality that is not created in the marketing department; (b) software and technology is free and open on the Internet ranging from blogging tools to Twitter and via Youtube, which will kill any uniqueness that big business gets from their technology investments as it will all become free – look what the Internet is doing for newspapers and music and watch it creep out into the physical world; (c) who really would want the hassle of managing a portfolio of expensive freehold/leasehold property like Tesco or Sainsbury or Whole Foods or Holland & Barrett which cannot be moved around nor is it being constantly advertised as in the retailing etherworld?

Steenbergs Listed in Rose Prince’s Latest Book

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Rose Prince has been really lovely and kind and listed us twice in her new book – The Good Food Producers Guide 2010 – under Drinks and under Delis and Specialists.  We always feel flattered – and a bit embarassed – when someone so influential likes Steenbergs products and so I thought it best to just quote straight from her book:

” Axel and Sophie Steenberg’s spices and teas are of the highest standard and are available by mail order.  The company was established in 2003 and due to demand for its products has had to move three times.  Now in an eco-friendly factory, they sell Fairtrade spices by mail order and to other retail outlets, as well as from factory gate.  Beautiful packaging; lovely business.”

“I have always liked Axel and Sophie Steenberg’s principled company, which specialises in high quality organic and / or Fairtrade spices, but it would not be fair to leave out their beautiful teas from this chapter of the guide.  They sell a huge range, most accredited by the Fairtrade Foundation, and many in funky-looking tins (great presents) that keep the tea inside nice and fresh.  Choose from some impressive grassy green teas, delicate unfermented, dried white teas and full-on matured black tea.  Herbs are also available. Order online.”

Thank you Rose.

Steenbergs As Recommended On Delia Online

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Steenbergs Home Bakery range has been recommended on Delia Online as a Good Buy today which is pretty nice really:

http://www.deliaonline.com/news-and-features/cupcakes.html